Pennsylvania Auto Insurance Comparison

Limited Tort vs. Full Tort Insurance in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania is one of a small number of states that makes drivers choose, at the moment they buy insurance, whether they will be allowed to sue for pain and suffering if someone else hurts them. That choice is called your tort election, and it is governed by 75 Pa. C.S. § 1705. Most people make it in thirty seconds to save a few dollars a month and never think about it again until the day they need it.

I have had this conversation hundreds of times with injured people in Camp Hill, Harrisburg, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh. Almost none of them remembered which box they checked. Many were told by an adjuster that limited tort meant they had no case. That is frequently wrong, because § 1705 contains a set of exceptions that restore full recovery — and because 'serious impairment of a body function' is a jury question, not an adjuster's decision.

Here is the honest comparison, including what limited tort actually costs you and the specific circumstances that void it.

Option A

Limited Tort

A lower-premium election under 75 Pa. C.S. § 1705(d) that preserves all economic damages but restricts recovery for pain and suffering unless an exception applies or the injury is a serious impairment of a body function.

  • Premium savings of roughly ten to fifteen percent on the liability portion of the policy
  • Full recovery of medical bills, lost wages, and out-of-pocket losses is preserved
  • Non-economic damages barred unless the injury qualifies as serious impairment of a body function
  • Statutory exceptions in § 1705(d) restore full tort rights in defined circumstances
  • The election binds the named insured, the spouse, and resident relatives who are not separately insured
Option B

Full Tort

The unrestricted election. You pay more in premium and retain the unqualified right to sue for pain, suffering, disfigurement, and loss of life's pleasures no matter how the injury is characterized.

  • No threshold to clear before non-economic damages are available
  • No fight over whether an injury is 'serious' enough to qualify
  • Materially stronger negotiating posture with the liability carrier
  • Costs a modest premium increase — typically the cheapest meaningful coverage upgrade on the policy
  • Especially important for households with children, older drivers, or anyone with a prior injury history
Side by Side

Limited Tort vs. Full Tort

Comparison of Limited Tort and Full Tort under Pennsylvania law
FactorLimited TortFull Tort
Statutory basis75 Pa. C.S. § 1705(d)75 Pa. C.S. § 1705(c)
Medical bills and lost wagesFully recoverableFully recoverable
Pain and sufferingBarred unless an exception applies or the injury is a serious impairment of a body functionAlways available
PremiumLower — typically a ten to fifteen percent saving on liability premiumHigher, usually by a small monthly amount
Who is boundNamed insured, spouse, and resident relatives without their own coverageSame household scope, with no restriction
DUI defendantException applies — full recovery restored under § 1705(d)(1)(i)No change; already unrestricted
Motorcyclist, pedestrian, or bicyclistException applies — § 1705(d)(3) removes the restriction when you were not occupying a private passenger motor vehicleNo change
Out-of-state or uninsured at-fault vehicleExceptions in § 1705(d)(1) can restore full tort rightsNo change
Litigation postureAdds a threshold issue the defense will contest at summary judgment and at trialLiability and damages only

What 'serious impairment of a body function' really means

Limited tort does not eliminate non-economic damages. It conditions them on a threshold: the injury must constitute a serious impairment of a body function. Pennsylvania courts assess that through the nature and extent of the impairment, the type of medical treatment required, the duration of the impairment, the extent of any residual limitation, and the prognosis for recovery. It is ordinarily a question for the jury.

In practice, insurers treat limited tort as an automatic denial. It is not. Documented herniations requiring injections or surgery, fractures with hardware, nerve injury with objective findings on EMG, traumatic brain injury with neuropsychological testing, and permanent scarring have all cleared the threshold in Pennsylvania courts. What loses is thin documentation — gaps in treatment, no objective imaging, and no physician statement tying limitation to the crash.

The exceptions that void limited tort entirely

Section 1705(d) lists circumstances where the limited tort restriction simply does not apply. These are not arguments about severity — they are categorical. When one fits, you recover as if you had elected full tort.

  • The at-fault driver is convicted of, or accepts ARD for, driving under the influence in the same incident — 75 Pa. C.S. § 1705(d)(1)(i)
  • The at-fault vehicle is registered in another state — a frequent scenario on I-95, I-80, and I-81 corridor crashes
  • The at-fault driver was uninsured at the time of the crash
  • The at-fault vehicle was intentionally used to cause injury
  • You were injured while not occupying a private passenger motor vehicle — including as a motorcyclist, bicyclist, or pedestrian — under 75 Pa. C.S. § 1705(d)(3)
  • You sustained a death, serious impairment of a body function, or permanent serious disfigurement

Who your election binds — and who it does not

The tort election on a Pennsylvania policy binds the named insured, that person's spouse, and resident relatives of the household who do not have their own auto coverage. A college student on a parent's policy in State College is bound by the parent's limited tort election. An adult child who lives at home and carries their own full tort policy is bound by their own election, not the parent's.

That household reach is why I tell people this is a family decision, not a personal one. Choosing limited tort to save a hundred and fifty dollars a year applies that restriction to your spouse and your teenage driver as well.

The economics, plainly

Limited tort saves most Pennsylvania households a modest amount on the liability portion of the premium. I have never had a client tell me the savings were worth it after a serious crash. The category of damages limited tort restricts — pain, suffering, disfigurement, and loss of life's pleasures — is frequently the largest component of an injury recovery, and it is the only category that compensates the human cost rather than the receipts.

If you take one practical step after reading this page, pull your declarations page and look for the tort election line. Changing from limited to full tort takes one phone call to your agent and takes effect prospectively. It will not help with a crash that already happened, but it protects your household going forward.

If you already have limited tort and you were hurt

Do not accept an adjuster's conclusion that you have no claim. My first steps are to obtain the declarations page and confirm the actual election in writing, check the exceptions in 75 Pa. C.S. § 1705(d)(1)(i) and § 1705(d)(3) against the facts, verify the at-fault vehicle's state of registration and insurance status, and pull the criminal docket to see whether DUI charges were filed.

Then we build the threshold record: consistent treatment, objective imaging, specialist opinions on permanency, and functional documentation of what you can no longer do at work and at home. Limited tort cases are won on medical documentation. That work starts in the first weeks, not the month before the two-year deadline in 42 Pa. C.S. § 5524.

Decision Helper

Which applies to your case?

Two questions come up: which should I buy, and does my election actually block my current claim? Here is how I answer both.

If you are buying or renewing a Pennsylvania auto policy
Choose full tort. The premium difference is small relative to what limited tort forfeits, and the election binds your spouse and resident children too.
If you have limited tort and the other driver was charged with DUI
Section 1705(d)(1)(i) removes the restriction on conviction or ARD acceptance. Pull the criminal docket and track the disposition.
If you have limited tort and you were on a motorcycle, bicycle, or on foot
Section 1705(d)(3) applies because you were not occupying a private passenger motor vehicle. Full recovery is available.
If the at-fault vehicle had out-of-state plates
A § 1705(d)(1) exception likely applies. Confirm the registration state from the crash report before conceding anything.
If you had surgery, hardware, nerve injury, a brain injury, or permanent scarring
You have a strong serious-impairment argument. Keep treating and make sure your physicians document permanency and functional limitation.
If an adjuster told you limited tort ends your claim
Get a second opinion before signing anything. That is a legal conclusion the adjuster has no authority to make, and it is often wrong.

Still unsure? Sean Quinlan reviews these questions personally in a free, confidential consultation — there is no obligation and no fee unless we win.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Free, Confidential, No-Obligation

Talk to Sean Quinlan about your case.

No Fee Unless We Win. Call now or request a free case review and Sean Quinlan will personally evaluate your case.